Fun Tricks Portal: mystery

Showing posts with label mystery. Show all posts

Student's life

Student's life

Dedicte 2 al studnt who r away frm home- Zindgi h Chhoti, hr Pal me Khush hu, Ghr se dur hu, colg me hi Khush hu, Aj kaju kari nhi h dal-...

Wednesday, January 09, 2013

<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: #cc9966; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; line-height: 22px;"></span><br />
<div>
<div align="center">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;"><img alt=":*:The mystery of Mona Lisa:*: - nov leonardo da vinci mona lisa la gioconda" hspace="0" src="http://f1.pepst.com/c/CF7F96/846958/ssc3/home/023/unsolved.mysteries/nov3leonardo_da_vinci_mona_lisa__la_gioconda_.jpg_480_480_0_64000_0_1_0.jpg" vspace="0" /></span></div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="space2" style="padding-bottom: 0.5em; padding-top: 0.5em;">
<div class="hr" style="border-top-color: rgb(170, 170, 170); border-top-style: solid; border-top-width: 1px;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;"><span></span></span></div>
</div>
</div>
<div>
<div align="center">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;"><br /></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;">The mystery of Mona Lisa </span></span></div>
</div>
<div align="center">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="center">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="center">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="font-size: x-large;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #cc9966; font-size: 13px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;">summit of the Italian Renaissance work, whose official name is "La Gioconda" but it also responds to "Madonna Elisa," hides under his canvas, many mysteries to be solved.<br />History<br />The painting, owned by Leonardo da Vinci, dating from the period between 1503 and 1506. It is an oil on poplar board of 77 x 53 cm, whose technique was the "sfumato", a procedure very typical of Leonardo da Vinci in which overlapping layers of paint very thin and delicate, achieving an effect that vaguely vaporous the sense of giving contours blur.<br /><br />In addition, the painter would play with prospects, thus drawing a horizon higher than another, which makes La Gioconda show higher if it is observed from the right side.<br /><br />The play is property of the French State since the sixteenth century and can be seen from the Louvre Museum in Paris.<br /><br />But despite the amount of technical and historical information we have about the Mona Lisa, the fact is that never have come to know a number of things: who is this mysterious woman, and above all why he smiles.<br /><br />According to information gathered, processed and even historical studies, the most popular theory is that this woman was the wife of Francesco Bartolomeo Giocondo (hence as "La Gioconda"), whose name was Lisa Gherardini.<br /><br />This theory is supported in his book "Mona Lisa, naive woman" the Italian historian Giuseppe Pallanti, convinced that it was Gherardini, a lady from Florence who had been married for a second time with Francesco. It would have been widowed and would have had five children with Lisa pins. According to studies, have been married when Lisa was 16 and would have posed for Leonardo when it had 24 or 25.<br />The historian would have called the "donna naive" because he was an affectionate nickname that her husband used to it.<br /><br />Other scenarios suggest that it was a courtesan, or an unrealistic model imagined by the artist. Even, it has come to say that it was Leonardo's own.<br /><br />However, the initial argument seems to be the most convincing. Pallanti gives strong evidence of that. Thus, it would confirm the theories put forward by the Italian writer Giorgio Vasari in "Lives of the best painters, sculptors and architects Italians," which was published in 1550 and would be expanded in 1568.<br /><br />Once completed, the question is what about what laughs Mona Lisa?<br /><br />Until Yale University in the U.S. we get closer to explain the research carried out there. They say the lady smiles because he is expecting a child. One reason is that, as the symptom of a pregnant woman, Lisa's hands are swollen. In addition, the manner in which they rest on the belly is feeling protective of her baby.<br /><br />It is said that Leonardo painted getting the effect by which if you look directly smile, it disappears and reappears only when you look anywhere else in the box.<br /><br />Whatever happens, never has come to know the real mood of the Mona Lisa. What is behind this mysterious and disconcerting smile, which seems to look as naughty, protective, sad, calm or even malevolent.<br /><br />So rest myths and legends in reference to the work, even more so when the Aug. 21, 1911 was stolen from the Louvre Museum. The author of the theft would be one Vicenzo Perugia, which the police managed to pick up in December of that year. After touring a number of cities such as Florence, Rome and Milan, again, safe and sound, the Louvre in 1914.<br /><br />He is currently protected by some potentísimos security systems and protection. In the same way, is also assured the survival of thousands of questions unanswered. Unknowns that always adorn the fame of the work.<br /><br />****************** </span></span></span></span></div>
</div>

:*:The mystery of Mona Lisa:*:

The mystery of Mona Lisa summit of the Italian Renaissance work, whose official name is "La Gioconda" but it...

Saturday, December 22, 2012

Alexander the Great and the Bermuda Triangle

<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial; font-size: large; line-height: 22px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #0c343d;">Alexander the Great and the Bermuda Triangle </span></span></div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; line-height: 22px;"><div style="text-align: center;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;"><br /></span></div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;">History<br />During his last campaign, Alexander was able to cross the river Indus, entering a strange land, never before seen by people outside this area of the planet.<br />In this adventure is accompanied by a remarkable army, plus soldiers from conquering the land that was in its path. But there was a core composed of Macedonians, like him, eager to return home. Had accompanied their leader for more than two years and less missed their families.<br />After a discussion, Alexander agreed to his return. They would in boats led by Admiral Nearco, who carry on the Persian Gulf and from there to the Mediterranean. But never again see their wives and children. That fleet disappeared so intriguing. The scholars have different theories to explain this event. One of them describes as guilty fierce storm, which would have led the craft into the depths. This is quite unlikely, since we are talking about dozens of boats. Another hypothesis suggests that the ships were ...</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; line-height: 22px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;">lost by not knowing those waters, the wrong path and deep into the peninsula of Malaysia. Even some researchers speculate that perhaps reached the islands of Tahiti and Hawaii, based on the similarity between some of the Hawaiian words and classical Greek. Such is the case of the term eagle aeto in the language of these islands and aetos in the language of Homer. The only certainty is that this vast fleet of hundreds of men had no more news. It seems certain that the sea has been a very conducive for such events. Were even more mysterious disappearances of crews as large as that of the Cyclops or the Marine Sulfur Queen. The first was an American ship of 19,600 tons, after leaving the March 4, 1918 Islands of Barbados, it never reached its destination. The ship, 542 feet long, was one of the largest vessels of its time. It consisted of a crew of 306 men and left to give signs of life shortly after his departure. Even distress signal was received and no one was found floating in the rest of the boat adrift. </span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; line-height: 22px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;">It was considering the hypothesis of an attack by German submarines, but the files show that neither consulted operating in that area by that date. Moreover, these ships were in the habit of providing radio major attack enemy ships, and this time, there was nothing.<br />It was also suggested that perhaps the boat hit a mine or a storm that has caused its collapse. But it was found that there were no mines in those waters and that the weather was ideal for navigation at the time of his disappearance. Moreover, in both cases the master would have enough time to issue an SOS signal, which never happened.<br />Something similar happened with the ship SS Marine Sulfur Queen, which did not release more after that on the morning of February 4, 1963 sent a message of routine when he was about 200 miles from Key West, Florida (EE UU). Subsequent failed attempts to contact the 39 sailors and crew were moved to join the list of disappearances tenebrosa high strangeness.</span></span></div>

Alexander the Great and the Bermuda Triangle

Alexander the Great and the Bermuda Triangle History During his last campaign, Alexander was able to cross the river Indus, entering ...

Thursday, December 20, 2012

:: The Mystery of Acambaro::

<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<br />
<div style="text-align: center;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; color: red; font-family: Arial; font-size: x-large; line-height: 22px;">The Mystery of Acambaro </span></div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; line-height: 22px;"><div style="text-align: center;">
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;"><br /></span></div>
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;"><br />History<br />Officially, we know the existence of dinosaurs from just over 2 centuries ... Therefore, officially, it is impossible for men who lived 3 000, 4 500 and 6 500 years, have been able to describe and produce figurines representing animals just now discovering. With regard to this dogma, many discoveries, like that of Acambaro are denied despite the evidence of dated ... because they do not fit with what is believed to know.<br />Dispensed and capable of new features to develop our knowledge. So far we have come ...<br />1923, is the co Waldemar Julsrud of civilization Churicuaro, discovery disputes, a local collector, will seek to rival that discredit.<br />1944, near the hill of Toro, discovered thousands of pottery figurines style unknown.<br />Strives to interest scientists, it offers the curious and the press, which makes a mistake. At the insistence of the issues, assign to the point of revealing his own theory, which will "put the scream in the sky" all archaeologists: according to him, these figurines which are in the company of men come from dinosaurs Atlantis.<br />From 1945 to 1946, Carlos Perea, head of the archaeological region Acambaro for the Museum of Anthropology in Mexico, will see more official excavations undertaken by the National Museum and the American Museum of Natural History, during which they also found dinosaur figurines.<br />Although the findings are not officially Julsrud, there is no doubt as to their authenticity.<br />In 1952, American archaeologist Charles C. Di Peso Acambaro attend for 3 days and lasts for 4 hours at home Julsrud.<br />Convinced of the authenticity of the piece, wants to buy some for his museum. Julsrud refuses because he never had the intention of profiting from their discovery and do not want to see spread before his collection to be examined by archaeologists. Just made a new enemy. Di Peso finds a rival collector figurines to buy, but the latter has no more than artifacts Tarascans. To avoid losing the sale and will no doubt adjust to old accounts, the seller has andalusia American archaeologist whole thing is mounted on a mixtificación Tinajero (Julsrud employee) and her two children.<br />Di Peso satisfy this explanation is without any verification. Upon return, your account will not suffer any doubt, the whole affair is nothing more than a sophisticated joke that Julsrud deceived (no one dares to put his honesty into question). In his article in April 1953 of American Antiquity, explains how he came to this conclusion: during an excavation by Tinajero noted that the earth had been moved before, and logically concluded that the devices were placed to be discovered again in his presence. The explanation is very different and will be tested later: Tinajero actually found hiding, but did not have enough time to complete a thorough job to prevent looting and plugged the hole. Again with Di Peso, glad not to disappoint the archaeologist and not wasting any time. Hell is paved with good intentions, it is said ...<br />Di Peso ensure his conviction of fraud after a thorough review of each of the 32 000 pieces discovered at that time. And that in a span of 4 hours! Claims to have meticulously examined 133 pieces per minute! over 4 hours without stopping! is not an archaeologist but Superman ¡!<br />Pretend that the parts are false due to the absence of residues in the hollow earth. Julsrud was honored just to clean them thoroughly as I would have done any real archaeologist. Moreover, the fact was confirmed by witnesses, the pieces that had not been cleaned carrying such waste, etc ...<br />Play here an important point in history when scientific arguments over the true development of an honest inquiry, not being able to take figurines, to discredit Take revenge on the matter, for spite, for we not jeopardize their reputation? We will never know.<br />Scientific measures taken less than 20 years later contradict. But the evil is done, for any archaeologist classic "Julsrud people" is nothing but an invention and no one will dare to look into the matter forward and risk his career and fame.<br />In 1954, the Mexican government sends a team of archaeologists, led by Dr. Eduardo Noguerain, ruins on the site and dig into another site, where other figurines were found. Conclude the authenticity of the site and filled with enthusiasm Julsrud in front of numerous witnesses. But 3 weeks later, in his report, deny the authenticity of the figurines of Julsrud due to representations of dinosaurs, too! Fantastic to be true!<br />Between truth and a ruined career, the choice is difficult for some ... And they risk denying their own discoveries ...<br />In 1955, the first visit by Charles Hapgood (professor of history and anthropology at the University of New Hampshire) ...</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; line-height: 22px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;">.during which Acambaro in fixed sites and witness the excavation. You will be convinced of the authenticity of the discovery. </span></span><br />
<span class="Apple-style-span" style="border-collapse: collapse; font-family: Arial; font-size: 13px; line-height: 22px;"><span class="Apple-style-span" style="color: #073763;">In 1968, the second visit of Charles Hapgood in Acambaro to take samples and submit them to the latest reliable methods of dating: Carbon 14 and thermoluminescence.<br />3 samples were delivered to the Laboratory of Isotopes Inc. of New Jersey to be dated with carbon 14: Show No. 1 (I-3842): 3590 + 100 1640 BC<br />Sample No. 2 (I-4015): 6480 + 170 - 4530 BC<br />Sample No. 3 (I-4031): 120 + 3060 - 1110 BC<br />In 1972, Arthur Young delivers samples to the laboratory at the University of Pennsylvania dated by thermoluminescence to:<br />The dates of these samples were uniform, about 2 500 years BC<br />These measures are reliable science. Therefore ¿archaeological opinion changed? No, because they cling to their dogma. It's impossible that men have known the dinosaurs! And that despite the evidence ...<br />In 1978, 2 poachers are caught in flagrante delicto salvage excavation near the hill of the goats. Stop 3 300 of which figurines dinosaurs. These figurines are used as currency in exchange for weapons (do gunrunners would pay with trinket?). The Court found that these artifacts were authentic and sentenced to imprisonment.<br />In 1990, an independent archaeologist, Neal Steedy chosen arbitrarily, for excavation, from a remote location Julsrud. Found some helmets, but no figurines. Carbon 14 tests gave them an antiquity of between 4 000 and 1 500 years. But these data were rejected and proclaimed that such fragments could not stay longer than 20 years in the soil. The remains of what may Chupicuaro, but not those of Julsrud ...<br /><br />******************* </span></span></div>

:*: The Mystery of Acambaro:*:

The Mystery of Acambaro History Officially, we know the existence of dinosaurs from just over 2 centuries ... Therefore, officially, ...

Thursday, December 20, 2012

Fun Tricks Portal

Student's life

::The mystery of Mona Lisa::

Alexander the Great and the Bermuda Triangle

:: The Mystery of Acambaro::

Popular Posts

Blog Archive

Student's life

:*:The mystery of Mona Lisa:*:

Alexander the Great and the Bermuda Triangle

:*: The Mystery of Acambaro:*:

Subscribe updates on your Email | RSS

::The mystery of Mona Lisa::

:: The Mystery of Acambaro::